Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
Jd>Jd Personal answerPro-life |
the Economy › Equal Pay
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Social › Gay Marriage
Jd>Jd Personal answerCan we just keep it simple, there was none of this crap back in the day, it’s completely irrelevant, this question shouldn’t even be one. |
Social › Euthanasia
Jd>Jd Personal answerAs in euthanasia, yup. |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
Jd>Jd Personal answerWell I mean entourage them all we can, if it keeps the the population down and gives these children homes I don’t see too bad of issue with it. |
the Economy › Taxes
Jd>Jd Personal answerLower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Marijuana
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Social › Death Penalty
Jd>Jd Personal answerWhat I believe is that anyone who kills more than two people (intentionally) deserves to die. |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo, this will only cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
Jd>Jd Personal answerAs long as it doesn’t come with dramatic added costs or management fees I say do the best we can to improve this factor but with out making it a drama. The RMA needs to be fixed because I don’t know how we expect with all these procreations and legislations in place.. it just makes it a heck of trouble for business to start up and it all it is, is funding for the government, but sure the odd bloke stuffs it for everyone. |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
Jd>Jd Personal answerIt would be a great kick off for the nation and from what I’ve discovered it would help out put people into their positions and sort them out but there many other beneficial reasons too especially now days - globally. |
the Economy › Welfare
Jd>Jd Personal answerMore, and deny benefits to immigrants |
Foreign Policy › Terrorist Citizenship
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, but provide treatment for those testing positive |
Social › Hate Speech
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
Education › University Tuition
Jd>Jd Personal answerUnder a condition where it is not taken for granted/abused whatever, this should be a scheme where in-order for it to be free the person must commit for the full duration. |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
Jd>Jd Personal answerOnce again irrelevant question, woman on their board of directors, seriously? |
Housing › Foreign Land Ownership
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, but only for overseas investors |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, but only if there is proof someone died from the drugs they trafficked |
Housing › Housing Infrastructure
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material |
Social › Transgender Athletes
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
Transportation › Public Transportation
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Retirement Age
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo, the current age of 65 is sufficient |
Domestic Policy › Maori Parliament Seats
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, race should not impact seats |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
Education › Te Reo Māori
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
Education › Student Allowance
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, it should be based off secondary/tertiary results and not the parents income |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatisation
Jd>Jd Personal answerI am satisfied with the current system |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
Jd>Jd Personal answerIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses |
Science › Nuclear Energy
Jd>Jd Personal answerAbsolutely, cheapest and most efficient energy source at this current time and only produces little waste, renewable energies are the way to go but before we become all renewable, nuclear energy is much more sufficient also we have learnt from catastrophe events in the past, many unintentionally, so with good restrictions and regulations in place this a green light for the better of sustainability and relatively cheaper for New Zealand citizens. |
the Economy › Government Spending
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
Jd>Jd Personal answerCurrently okay with the current position. |
Domestic Policy › Woman Quotas
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Fracking
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Social › Niqāb
Jd>Jd Personal answerThis is getting ridiuclous. |
Social › Women in Combat
Jd>Jd Personal answerDumb question, if the world is seriously getting to this point, sometimes you gotta ask yourself, what defines humanity. |
Foreign Policy › Israel Boycott
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Crime › Private Prisons
Jd>Jd Personal answerLet’s not make New Zealand more corrupted than it currently is, simple answer is no. Whoever thinks about saying yes to this, better have a profession in dealing with situations which get out of hand. because for the corrections minister to go along with this, well I guess I would like to see it happen. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
Jd>Jd Personal answerUmm I think we are misinterpreting the point, they are in prisons for a reason. |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo, Waste of time and funding altogether. |
Social › Parental Leave
Jd>Jd Personal answerThat’s as good as you’ll get it. |
the Economy › Bonus Cap
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
Crime › Defunding the Police
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Labor Unions
Jd>Jd Personal answerHelp, in theory but have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
Jd>Jd Personal answerAbsolutely, this would help a lot not just communication orally but on roads is where it matters. |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
Elections › Campaign Finance
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilise prices |
Housing › Land Supply
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
Jd>Jd Personal answerI say they shouldn’t get away with it so easy, maybe we could up with a program that would reduce the amount of people in prisons, I mean think about it, with the technology these days we could do a lot to keep people safe and to surveillance these non-violet prisoners. |
the Economy › State Ownership
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Government Pensions
Jd>Jd Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Tariffs
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, and require a public audit each year they are in office |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes, it will bring economic growth to all countries involved |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
Jd>Jd Personal answerDecrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit |
the Economy › Bitcoin
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
Jd>Jd Personal answerIncrease |
Elections › Elected Representatives
Jd>Jd Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
Jd>Jd Personal answerAmazon and Facebook could be possibilities but google is harmless. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 22 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.