Do you support the death penalty?

The prison if the date lines with back sides of the arrested wanted by police by legend former US president Donald Trump and former UK prime minister Boris Johnson taking white House issued

Yes, for murder. Most other serious crimes can be punished with incarceration in a penal gulag. Criminals should work to repay society for their deeds

only if they did a terrible crime like the man who commited the terrible crime of killing the muslim people in christchurch

No but I think life sentences are a joke and more time needs to be given to those who commit horrific offences such as murder or sexual assault

Yes, but only in cases where extreme harm to communities can be proven, for example: reckless disregard for or intentional environmental pollution/habitat destruction or high level financial fraud.

Where there is concrete proof (video evidence, multiple eye witness accounts), that someone has committed a hideous crime, then this form of capital punishment may be considered
Where a prosecution has only managed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that someone likely committed the crime, then this is not a suitable punishment, as future technology or evidence may overturn the verdict

Yes, but only if the evidence is undeniable and they have had an assessment suggesting they would recommit crime if released

Yes for horrific violent and sexual crimes against children.

No. However you should sever the sentence in your own country.

No, spending life in prison without the chance of parole is a harsher sentence

yes but only if the problem is really big and can't be fixed

Yes, what a waste of tax payer money keeping them alive. Although undeniable evidence must be obtained.

No, not until prison populations reflect the demographical proportions of the outside population to prevent corrupt practice.

Should serve jail time first

Yes, if they have done an absolutely horrific crime, such as murder, rape, etc. They should have the same or at least similar done to them so that they can know the pain their victim went through.

For repeat offenders of murders & sexual crimes

No, not enough faith in the legal system to convict correctly.

No, the state does not have a right to execute its own citizens.

depending crime

No, for the small number of cases that it would ever be "justified", it is not worth it

If you are convicted of Murder, rape, terrorism, sexual abuse of anyone, and/or being a pedophile, the person should have all rights stripped away from them and used for medical experimentation till death.

Yes but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence and a strike system so not on first conviction

Three strike system of horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence including them admitting to their crime

yes, crime rate will go down, government is too soft on crimes here

No, for the worst crimes committed with undeniable evidence, the person(s) should never be released back into the public

Yes for pedophiles and rapist.

If the choice to euthanize some one the choice to reinstate the death penalty.

If somebody intentially hurts a child or the elderly then the death penalty should be considered AND decided by a majority vote (of new zealand citizens born and living in in nz only for the majority of their lives. Also they need to be 18 or over to vote)

half and half - who are we to end a life in place of a life being taken but also prisons are over-crowded and we pay too much money to keep them running. Needs more work.

No but there should be a harsher sentence than just life in prison without parole

Yes but there has to be zero doubt that they committed the crime.

pedos should get products tested on them instead of animals

Yes, but only for horrific crimes and they should be given the choice.

yes , if the prisoner has extended sentence and wishes to have assisted dying

Yes, For prisoners that want to die

Yes but only for convicted pedophiles

Yes, but only with undeniable evidence i.e the mosque attacks were filmed and we saw the perpetrators face numerous time, without a doubt he did it.

Victims should decide on punishment, but there must be indeniable evidence that the person has committed the crime.

I think there are more pressing issues in NZ at the moment

Case by case basis. The risk of wrongful conviction is still too high but in some cases it may be the most merciful thing for both criminal and victims.

yes all crimes including stealing and other minor misdemeanors should should result in the death penalty

Yes, but only for those so irredeemably violent that the only achievable incarceration goal is their complete and permanent removal from society.

Yes but only after they cant be made to work and be useful to society. This is for clearly defined undeniable crimes that are evidence based, and only

If they have a darker skin tone, i believe they should be lynched

Life sentence, should be given for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence and for those crimes committed where bodies are disposed of.

Only if they have done something really bad (abuse or murder)

People convicted could choose between death penalty or lifetime in prison

No break their legs instead make them suffer

No but a life in prison sentence should be longer than what it currently is

No, the government does not have the right to murder its own citizens

Yes, but only when there is no doubt they are guilty

The convicted person should be offered the choice of either when they are first incarcerated - that way, if they are wrongfully convicted, they can choose not to be killed.

Yes but only for pedos

Yes, but the victims family is to decided the punishment and only an option for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence.

Yes, but only for horrific crimes when it has become apparent rehabilitation is infeasible

Yes, but only for horrific crimes (rape, pedophilia, necrophilia, homicide, etc...) with undeniable evidence, as well as the victim's family should decide the punishment (let the family decide if they want to do the honours)

Life in prison should mean Life in prison.

Yes but only for murder and above

Yes, but only for horrific crimes, with overwhelming evidence, that there is no likeliness of rehabilitation, and the victim or victim's family agree

death toll result are unbove more increase by justice of courts and victims supports is instants by new Zealand governments use counselling by law give answerskepts the villages more less increase play games and use mask up crash and death tolls less decrease under bank of surveillance give up these up of flap the tops of drink resopsity by liquors laws and identities give use 32+ not 16 or over 18 less 17 licences belongs links

If they’ve been through rehab and we’ve tried everything and it hasn’t worked then yes

Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence, only for killing over 20 people.

Only when killing police force member

Yes. Convicted should choose method

A level of Murder similar to the USA. First degree etc. conviction for 1st is life imprisonment no chance of parole. Or Cumulative life sentences for multiple murders, no parole

it depends because if someone kills someone its not right for us to kill them back because hat shows us we are as bad as them so i would think keep them in jail to rot

i have know idea

no because some people may be found guilty but never have done it so it is inhumane to kill them

If it is Really bad

I think that it should never be brought back because there are too many cons about the death penalty such as racism and not only that but people get judgemental and the legal system is not fair.

No, we should focus on rehabilitation as opposed to executing convicted criminals.

Yes, especially for drug crimes in order to reduce the horrifically high drug use rates here.

Only for mass or terrorist murder

Depending on the degree of the crime. If it was a mistake and you want to turn your life around a year is more than enough If it is repetitive then jail for life

Yes, but only for prisoners whom have committed serious crimes against and are a danger to other human beings (e.g murder, rape etc) and I believe there should be somewhat of a scoring system.

no but a long time in prison

yes, if it was for certain crimes

No but send foreign people back to their own country and make "life" with no parole unless evidence of their innocence changes

I believe prison should be a place you would never want to experience. You gave up your rights when you did the crime

No, but I do believe prison sentences should be harsher.

Yes, but only for absolutely heinous crimes, without doubt of conviction 100%.

Yes for rapist, paedophiles, terroists and very very serious offenders.

Yes but Too many people in our current system are wrongly convicted. So it’d have to be with totally undeniable evidence

No, death should never be an option. Majority of the criminals suffer from mental illnesses I suggest using the restorative justice system. Where offenders explain their actions to victims.

everyone should have the chance of rehabilitation, life meaning life until death in prison
should be an option , this should be reassessed after 25 yrs, if a parolee leaves prison and kills some one the whole parole board sitting on that case should be killed by the family of the victim ( horribly tortured first)

Torture paedophiles

Depending on the pre meditation, reasons leading up to, mental state etc

No, a person should be given every chance to rehabilitate regardless of their crimes

Only if it costs too much to jail them.

Yes, for the murder of a police officer while carrying out their duties or other emergency service personnel responding to an emergency.

Just bring in assassinations for the worst and just say they've disapleared RR

They should be executed within the year of sentencing.

Only for attempted suicide

If they are from another country they should be deported

No, but mild torture should be available for the worst crimes.

Why not. The south Auckland rapist, the terrorist in Christchurch, Swann the fraudster from Dunedin, the gang members who beat a prostitute to death while barking at her. Kill them all. I wouldn't miss them. Liberals cry about the death penalty but are happy to kill unborn babies such hypocrisy.

Only if it was like Christchurch shoting

For the rapists