Should corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations be allowed to donate to political parties?

Established parties should only receive public funding, while smaller parties may be get donations up to a set limit.

Flags ups and political and sentence of development with work and incomes finding a deals over profits and files are opened IRD is recommended by default letters

The united of unions for non profit dramatic cause by legend former US president Donald Trump and former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson straight wings talk white House

Yes, but political campaigns should receive some public funding. There should be limit to the amount corporations, unions and not-profit organisations can donate and all must be declared. There should also be an upper limit to the total amount political parties receive (say $1 million a year). This combination of public funding, limits on individual donations, public declaration and a limit on total donations will level the playing field for all parties.

Yes, people should be able to do what they want with their money.

Coporatuins should, but not unions

Yes but must be published

Non profit organisatios should NOT be allowed to donate as they have a tax free status.

Yes, but limit the amount that can be donated, and provide public disclosure of the donation

Yes but limit the amount they can donate and make it transparent

Yes, but all such donations should be disclosed.

No, individual donations only

Yes, but make it public for all voters to see political influence.

Yes, but whoever donates should be public information

Yes, but it must be disclosed if over $1,000

Yes, but any donations made to a party previously in government must be divided amongst all parties in parliament based on their representation in parliament. And all donations must be made publicly.

Yes to unions & corporations. No to non-profits

As long as it is all above board and recorded on a public register and nothing is hidden

Yea as long as all info about the donation is released to the public in a very accessible and visible way.

non for profits and it should be fully disclosed

Yes but with full disclosure that is stated clearly on all communications and promotions of that party

Yes, but should be transparent, showing the origin of the money

transparently yes. amount & who/entity publicly avail.

No, only individuals should be allowed to donate, all donations should be public and there should be limits to the amount donations can be.

Only unions and non-profits, with a limit proportional to each party and required disclosure on all donations

Yes but full disclosure for transperancy

Corporations yes, not unions and NPOs

Yes as long as they're made public and limited

yes, but limit the amount they can donate and there should be full transparency around donations

It depends what impact it has on new zealand

Yes but limit amount of donation and all donations must be made public

No this isn’t democratic. Have a limited, set public funding available to all political campaigns.

No, political campaigns should be publicly funded on capped funds.

Yes, but limit the amount they can donate, and ensure the donations are public and transparent.

No, Why???

Yes but have no ability to advertise or persuade votes. It's just a donation nothing else.

All lobbyists and donators should be forced to public ally announce what why and how much particularly conflicts

Yes, but full transparency about such donations should be guaranteed

Yes, but limits and transparency are key requirements.

Yes but published.

They already do but full transparency should be required.

No, only unions should be able to donate to political parties.

Brible is Christ of Jesus when keep one by two is labour is ingrammed is in temple is lord of owner inc

Yes, but it must be announced publicly

the unions is the excuses in the process and bring worse can uplifting downstairs under maori deep under shores with ireland elections by virus in negeter with phone calling as the united states with joe biden have the whos wants becomes next prime minister of the winners but the terriers attacks former australia prime minister scootb morrisons and under- deputy prime minister of australian with more decrease plan in place no changes or charges with the is decrease amounted races

the world nations and kept the unions spin topped abbbs without open polyenes and mobbs and personal is taxes and upped top headed tan and marking great union spirits and open skir themes under surveillance allows and dividend an other live stream newsmaking and host- presents samantha hayes and michael morars and the nickies skyites sports host or presents host with stadiums with oral area events sliver ferns and all blacks nrl warriors coach of the years awards virus with english former first five enlighten johnny wilkinson as best dropped goalers of the best coveters

Yes, but all donations should be properly disclosed and political parties should be held to their election promises which should also be properly disclosed.

Only for my party

Only allow donations from unions

really couldnt care less

If declared yes

Limit depending on the size of the party. Smaller parties can get more donations.

Yes if it is transparent.

Yes, but transparency is needed, and donations should remain anonymous.

Yes within a limit and complete public transparency

Yes, as long as their donation doesnt influence policies

yes, so long as it was fully declared and transparent to voters

yes but all must be declared and titalled

If above board/declared/open

We should dramatically change our government to a randomised design govt, more like Iceland where 100 crime free citizens are elected and then go through policies science schooling prior to serving for 4 years in parliament.

As per the current law

Yes but it should be made public

That should be your own choice

Should there be more transparency in who is funding political campaigns? Why or why not?

What, in your opinion, would make political campaigns more accessible for candidates without wealthy connections?

How would you feel if a politician you support accepted large donations from groups you disagree with?

Do you think public perception of a candidate changes based on where their campaign money comes from?

How might a candidate winning due to huge financial backing make you feel about the future of democracy?

Should there be limits on how much individuals or companies can donate to political campaigns, and why?

Have you ever considered how campaign donations might affect the decisions of elected officials?

How do you think money influences the fairness of elections in your country?

How would knowing where a candidate’s money comes from influence your decision to vote for them?

If campaigns were entirely government-funded and private donations banned, how do you think elections would change?