Euthanasia, the practice of ending a life prematurely in order to end pain and suffering, is currently considered a criminal offense.
@9G47KJJ6mos6MO
Only if there is no chance they will survive their illness, after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice, should be allowed to refuse artificial life support
@9FXY2777mos7MO
It’s not assisted suicide!!! It’s the right to pass peacefully without pain and suffering on your own terms
@9FXSLNDNew Zealand Loyal7mos7MO
I don't trust the doctors, so if they get multiple opinions from not just GPs or Psychologist but naturopaths and different alternate private medicine doctors too. To stop them from being convinced to commit suicide from a sick twisted doctor like the ones who convinced pregnant women and children to get the clot shot.
@9FWVPBS7mos7MO
Yes, but I take "examination" out of the yes statement, It is really important that the person understands the choice and that they are making a conscious choice, rather than acting out of despair or self-destructive anger. But a professional examination enables a clinician to arrive at a view but it is the patient who needs to be clear-headed and to make their choice.
@9FT9T8T7mos7MO
Yes, everyone should have the right to end their pain and suffering if there is no hope for survival and all information given so they know the choice they are making.
@9FHS5JY7mos7MO
I believe mostly in palliative care.
Yes, but I think this shouldn’t be limited to just the terminally I’ll
Yes but with 2 components - no chance they will survive and a psychological examination
@9FB9HJW7mos7MO
The bill needs strong guides
@9F7BTVF7mos7MO
@9F3PSGY7mos7MO
Individuals, regardless of health, should have the right to a quick painless death.
Maybe, but this needs to be more thought through than what was supplied in the referendum
@9DYRZF88mos8MO
We need excellence in palliative care
Yes, and it should be easier to legally give consent in advance in case the illness makes it impossible to later give consent.
Only if they are in cure to prevent pain / can no longer function with basic day to day tasks - vegetable state
@9DPR86Q8mos8MO
Yes, but only if there are no other options that could improve their life.
@9DMHH658mos8MO
Yes, but measure should be in place to make sure that it is their own decision and they have not been persuaded to do so
@9DMFB3R8mos8MO
Yes but there should be no pressure on anyone to provide this service. Consider zoom/mail management for rural or disadvantaged communities a là the Cannabis Clinic.
@9DKDH278mos8MO
Yes, but only once the hospice is properly funded by the government
@9DHY6M88mos8MO
Yes if clearly they are at the end, and there is no chance of survival and the person is in a lot of pain. They understand what they are doing.
@95KSND52yrs2Y
No, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support and more leniency on anyone who did assist
@94R8MXL2yrs2Y
mental health and nurse check list basic watch out don't look down or else themes is dark deeps under rips and referral basic its classic can leaves more increase markables use can stoen the work cars and dhb break down swinging the laurages is under raping and contains condoms use killer fire burn't and use more treatments sadly its gone irish or international indiana more nationality turn actions is decrease comes rights is story mode talking 2 muchless fast talker it seems a attentions creating dramas
@94BLN8N2yrs2Y
knife stabbing by a women and 32's and who give 67 years older by nana naps by top a secrets use less decrease by justice of health line cares less rudes besides taste of chocolates of heartlovers by wedding marriages and euegenments is said the roved is chase doesn't enquirers my reasonable is accessbly by gental in aotearoa
@946J2D52yrs2Y
Homcide by criminal tag and break inn the bins return them at least increase under unkrianes under whelsh with dirty pre minister high in nzxi by Dina prince Diana which the rights hurt the public's community in under nath darkness is hoodies
@93Z232G2yrs2Y
Yes, but only with two or more family members permission
@93FZ6RZ2yrs2Y
yes, but they should go under a psychological exam as well as getting am opinion from a partner or family member of their choice.
@92YDPY32yrs2Y
Yes if they really want to
@8VN2SQC3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if they have no chance of surviving their illness and their immediate family agrees.
@8J5NSB34yrs4Y
Only if the level of suffering is no longer treatable at a reasonable level of existence so pain outweighs gain
@8J2GLM54yrs4Y
No, more funding should be put into respite care and hospices
@8J2CQQT4yrs4Y
I think yes but there needs to be an age limit much older than 18
@8HYQWXQ4yrs4Y
Yes, but there needs to be laws in place to protect the innocent from being coerced into this. There should be a requirement for independent witnesses and review and it made illegal for doctors who do not comply with a robust system with tiered stages where the patient can opt out if they change their mind.
@8HWVDQ34yrs4Y
Yes, but I will not be voting for it as the way it has been written leaves too many loopholes for vulnerable people
@8HTRTSL4yrs4Y
Yes, but only if they have two assessments of their illness and two psychological assessments
@8HTNRH84yrs4Y
@8H9ZN3S4yrs4Y
No, rather require them to assist for medical research.
@8H5KQP74yrs4Y
Yes but more needs to be done to protect vulnerable from making the wrong decision - there is no second chance here
@8GRJZPJ4yrs4Y
Yes but psychological examination & better care in hospitals. My cousin was terminally ill & they wouldn't even give him a sleeping tablet or proper pain medication under hospital care. It was appalling so of course people want to kill themselves. Hospice drugs & care much better but I worry many people won't get here as it's the end of the line
@8GL8P5P4yrs4Y
Yes but only if this decision has been made while fully cognitive, understanding this choice. At the same time no person (i.e. a family member or friend) should be forced against their will to assist the terminally ill patient.
@8GKW6MV4yrs4Y
Yes but it’s not suicide
@8GDYG9Q4yrs4Y
Yes but under very strict circumstances
@8G2FGD54yrs4Y
Only if they have no chance of survival and are in intolerable pain
@8F3VH9W4yrs4Y
Not via a doctor. Don’t tel me how to be a doctor if you haven’t gone through medical school and learnt ethics
@8F3QDHV4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as two members of their family/nok allow it
@8DMT9L44yrs4Y
Yes, but protections for potentially vulnerable terminally ill patients from coercion by family members needs to be in place first. As well as acknowledgement that terminal diagnoses aren't usually that accurate.
@8BZF2GM4yrs4Y
This is a Conscience issue for each of the parties MPs
@9DMSH5C8mos8MO
Yes, but psychological evaluation should be done on both the patient individually and with their family to ensure that there is no manipulation from outsiders affecting their choice.
Yes and those with degenerate conditions such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, Dementia ect
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...