Should a capital gains tax be introduced?

Yes for overseas investors and investment property

Dont understand

Yes, but this should be accompanied by reduction or elimination of other taxes (such as no tax on income and dividends in KiwiSaver allowing for better compounding. Then capital gains tax when drawing in retirement. This encourages saving and allows for wealth building).

No, use an ad valorem tax instead.

Yes on investment properties but should be tax deductible expense

Everyone should by a 5% capital gains tax, not just targeting certain contributing members of society.

Should focus on the Rich avoid taxes

On investment properties for citizens and on properties owned by foreigners

Yes but only on 2nd or more rental and on overseas investors

Only if all business gains are taxed equally eg shares

Yes but only on 2 or more houses. Not family homes.

this is a complicated question. yes we need one but there has to be a high thresh hold. kiwis already get taxed a lot and have low wages, and everything is expensive! we cant have a capital gains tax that prohibit hard working people from climbing up the ladder. but if you are already excessively wealthy, or a property investor etc then yes. i dont trust this labour government to do it. it has to be target for the very wealthy, corporations etc. but not on assets that arent generating money. you might own something expensive that doesnt generate money and now you have to pay a tax on it. there needs to be rigorous public debate

Land value tax instead

Yes, for investment property, overseas investors and anyone who flips things during a certain timeframe (3 months)

They should overseas issues by legends former US president Donald Trump and former UK Prime minister's office with investigation of ends

Yes, but only for overseas investors who buy more than 3 hectares of land and family have no relation to New Zealand

Definable for overseas investors at a high rate and building investment properties not private properties as you should be able to have 2 properties per NZ citizens only

I would prefer a wealth tax or land tax or a combination of the two and make the first 20-30,000 of income tax free

Yes, but only after a limit, eg, on the 3rd investment property or if valued over a certain amount, so small investors don't get hit.

Capital gain tax should be implemented if you have MORE THAN 1 rental. Everyone should be entitled to have at least one rental property to assist them in their retirement years, because the pension is certainly not enough. People who have a rental property have worked hard, and planned hard for their retirement years.

15% CGT would be fair for 1 or 2 investment properties. After this then it is a business and needs to be taxed accordingly.

Yes, but only on second (or more) properties

I don't have enough knowledge about this topic ethier to make a proper statement concerning it.

Yes, on houses over $2 million

Yes, and lower tax for all under $150,000 - get the tax from richer people and those gaining elsewhere

Yes on both investment properties and for overseas investors

No, but they should increase subsidies for first home buyers

Yes but investment properties and overseas investors

Yes, but only on short term investment. The time should matter. Hold longer = less tax or no tax

As long as losses can be claimed as well And for shares as well as investment property

Yes, but not on a family home.

Only on investment property and on foreign investors. No continuous capitals gains tax on stock market investment

Yes, on investment property and overseas investors, but not on day-to-day home owners.

Yes but only on the 3rd or more properties owned and also if those properties are sold within 3 years of purchasing

Yes but only if 2 or more owned. Allows for Owner occupied and either 1 rental or 1 holiday home.

We already have one. Bright line test.

Yes but only for people who own multiple properties, rather than the "mum and dad with a single rental and family home"

Yes, but for those that own more than 3x investment houses

don’t know enough about it to comment

yes, but no exceptions. must be over all property.

Tax on equity and reduce income tax

yes, only a little

Yes, but I believe if you are not born in this country capital gains tax should be implied just for the share fact that kiwis miss out

i think if you don't own it you should not but if you have lots of money you should pay more tax for the things you own

yes for a shortened time such as 2 years

Yes, but for investment properties and overseas investors.

Yes but only based on equity gain less initial investment and inflation

Yes, but not for Mum&Dad investment properties trying to secure their future. Limit ownership to 4

On houses more than the average house price and land

On properties after the first two owned.

It needs to be fair across all types of investments

Yes, but only on property

Yes, but only for investment properties sold within 10 years of purchase.

yes, only when the gains is paid out to prevent impact on assent rich but income poor older citizens

Yes, if you have more than 3 investment properties and are an overseas investor

Not if it is your home that you live in for a certain time period

Yes, but not on the first home or a subsequent home i.e. holiday home and family home, but on every home after that and trusts should be looked at as well as well as families who are putting housing into their children’s names

Yes if you have more than 3 properties. Some people have a family home, an investment and a Bach. Any more than that needs to have capital gains.

Yes, but linked to your overall tax burden

All income should be taxed at the same flat rate no matter the source of the income

Yes, accordingly to the percentage of earnings gained.

Yes but only on investment property and only at a flat rate of say, 10% rather than a person’s marginal tax rate.

Yes but only for realized capital gains

Don't have enough knowledge on this topic.

Where it benefits poor people donthe riggt thing

Yes, but all other taxes and payments that have been put in place in the recent past to avoid this debate should be removed

Only if the prices of properly are decreased

i don't have the best knowledge for this.

I don't have knowledge on this topic

Introduce a land tax instead

Yes, but very small amount (10% or so)

Yes, and it's insane that a capital gains tax isn't already implemented in the country.

Yes, needs to be thought through

Yes and a cap should be placed on how many properties an individual can own

When investments (and interest is deductible) are sold including farmers

Yes on investment properties and also for houses that are built to sell for a profit but not holiday homes

Yes, but only for people owning more than 2 homes.

A wealth tax is preferable to CGT

Yea on investment, and overseas owners

I don't get it.

Yes, but not on the house you live in

Yes, but only for a small percentage of highest earning New Zealanders

Yes, for overseas investors and portfolio holders where properties aren't contributing to housing but used as accommodation e.g air bnb

No, a Land Value Tax is a better alternative.

limit developer property investment

No understand

Yes but for overseas investors and people who buy rentals often

Yes but only when they own more then two properties

Yes but only for the most wealthiest of New Zealanders and foreign investors

Yes, but not on the family home.

Yes for 3 or more properties

No, because that decision will damage new zealand

if people own above a certain amount of properties so that it does not target those who say own 2 homes and it's not their main business but those who have invested in many properties for financial gain

what does this mean

NZ already has a capital gains tax on property And there are a number loopholes to get around it

I do not have sufficient knowledge to be able ot answer this question accurately

Only for people with 3 or more houses

Yes but only on people who own more that two houses.

Small percentage on everything including family home