Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @9DXWGKPNationalanswered…7mos7MO

No but any financial interests that may relate to decisions they look after should be made public

 @9J78RN2 answered…2mos2MO

Tax flags ups and Ireland with taiwan more French Maoris unions help the poor policy deals with prices taggers and the banks ASB use needs westpacs credit over balances ANZ top dollars with partners ASB bank branch operations officer

 @9HK9YD6 answered…4mos4MO

The tax deduction of independent consultant supporters without more elderly taxbpayers money by legend former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and former US president Donald Trump both talks conical offers

 @9G5KLJTanswered…6mos6MO

Yes - but via an internal audit only. Not to be made public unless clear conflict of interest is evident.

 @9FDRVYDGreenanswered…6mos6MO

No, but an independent audit should be conducted and a plain-language earning and asset holdings summary should be communicated to the public

 @9F8GVBZACTcommented…7mos7MO

Yes, and require a public audit each year they are in office

Politicians should be required to release their tax returns, so people can see where their income is coming from. Having been in politics, their earnings from their political office is only part. Their income from company boards, trusts and other roles is quite significant and depending on how high this is and where it is coming from will provide transparency to their voters. They then have quite a factual tool to determine whether that politician has integrity or is lying to them about their political stance or motivation to support/decline certain policies.

 @9B8PBMDanswered…12mos12MO

No, but they should have their career / academic and work history scruitinised so to balance of power involves both the popular and the capable!

 @9FKC4GSanswered…6mos6MO

No, as long as they can prove everything is above board when investgated

 @9F6KMCPanswered…7mos7MO

Yes, and require public audit each year they’re in office; also for close family members

 @9DSLBFGanswered…7mos7MO

 @9DSKHY5Opportunitiesanswered…7mos7MO

Exact tax records are not necessary, but they should delcare any conflict of interests related to assets - being an investment property owner for example.

 @9DRY5BB answered…7mos7MO

Maybe, but their financial ties with businesses should be made public (for example, shares they have, how much campaign funding they receive from who)

 @9DFBBRVOpportunitiesanswered…7mos7MO

Yes, but only the top 2 leaders of each party should be legally required.

 @9D99XZTGreenanswered…8mos8MO

 @9D87P92Greenanswered…8mos8MO

 @9D84MNFanswered…8mos8MO

Yes, but only if they are benefiting from their political position for personal gain (outside their salaries to perform their governmental duties)

 @9D6XFNCLabouranswered…8mos8MO

 @9D3SMMCanswered…8mos8MO

no, but they should have like public audit for every 3 years they are in government.

 @97XF94Lanswered…1yr1Y

No, but Inland Revenue should make private investigations into candidates tax returns.

 @95Q2FPCanswered…2yrs2Y

under is candiateds with ireland over opening internationals with damages air planets with mars global aim the reason is closing use excuses in process and harmed and mothers and fathers as birth certificates medical is baking s cakes is didn't more decrease under increase is mother-white personal is unwell eye can white dipped with whipped wearing with bra and panties with insides and dress drama attacks is under kidnapped sadly most european with gangsters use can aotearoa without barianes with australian and hopes is bless and tapued and womens ridges and fudges by breast cancers and…  Read more

 @95FNLHXanswered…2yrs2Y

un tax reveues governments as the beehives can the worse light winners with releases it and confessional can mites rather going or going nothing brighters virus

 @946J2D5answered…2yrs2Y

I crease the decrease in inland markets goez up which Increase it mite give united states' of Meric. Former president of Donald trump's excuse more German financially when the under lower. Cost of living on the side of homelezz

 @9F6MH8Canswered…7mos7MO

 @9DXWNWQGreenanswered…7mos7MO

 @9DQYCW8answered…7mos7MO

No - but it should be fair & they should get the same as others even with pay etc

 @8H7C4LRanswered…3yrs3Y

A process showing integrity and due diligence is a minimum requirement before and during office

 @8H62ZNCanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, if there is a need to. Depends on whether the politician’s background

 @8FXM7SYanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8GKCY72answered…3yrs3Y

No - that is a question for the USA - Donald Trump definitely should because it is accepted practice in the US - any undue influence should be declared eg funding from outside of NZ or big business.

 @9DJ2WY7answered…7mos7MO

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...