Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Māori electorate:
City:
Electorate:
Postcode:
@9F6KMCP1yr1Y
Yes, and require public audit each year they’re in office; also for close family members
Yes but not publically, to a committee
@9DX8MQ41yr1Y
No, but external audits should take place.
I'd rather know where there money comes from than how much it is
No but any financial interests that may relate to decisions they look after should be made public
Yes, but only the top 2 leaders of each party should be legally required.
@9D84MNF1yr1Y
Yes, but only if they are benefiting from their political position for personal gain (outside their salaries to perform their governmental duties)
@9J78RN2 1yr1Y
Tax flags ups and Ireland with taiwan more French Maoris unions help the poor policy deals with prices taggers and the banks ASB use needs westpacs credit over balances ANZ top dollars with partners ASB bank branch operations officer
@9HK9YD6 1yr1Y
The tax deduction of independent consultant supporters without more elderly taxbpayers money by legend former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and former US president Donald Trump both talks conical offers
@9G5KLJT1yr1Y
Yes - but via an internal audit only. Not to be made public unless clear conflict of interest is evident.
@9F6MH8C1yr1Y
Not to the public, but no secrets within party/ government
Yes, but only if it is requested by an authority
Only if it is something which could comprimise their situation
No, but their income should be regulated
Yes - if there’s a conflict of interest
@9DSLBFG1yr1Y
No but this should be subject to audit by government if not already
Exact tax records are not necessary, but they should delcare any conflict of interests related to assets - being an investment property owner for example.
@9DRY5BB 1yr1Y
Maybe, but their financial ties with businesses should be made public (for example, shares they have, how much campaign funding they receive from who)
@9DQYCW81yr1Y
No - but it should be fair & they should get the same as others even with pay etc
@9DHFRYH1yr1Y
@9DDF9MD1yr1Y
@9DCFYPK1yr1Y
No but someone should be checking on it
We are not America. Get rid of this question.
@9DC9NQC1yr1Y
Only interests via Shares and major shareholding
The Members Registry of Interests is all that is required
I need more information about this issue before voting on it
@9D7C9VL1yr1Y
No, unless there is suspicious activity
No. Perhaps just a internal audit to track any usual spending
@9D6TK8RDemocracyNZ1yr1Y
i dont have much knowledge on this subject
@9D3SMMC2yrs2Y
no, but they should have like public audit for every 3 years they are in government.
No, but an independent audit should be conducted and a plain-language earning and asset holdings summary should be communicated to the public
@9FKC4GS1yr1Y
No, as long as they can prove everything is above board when investgated
@95Q2FPC2yrs2Y
under is candiateds with ireland over opening internationals with damages air planets with mars global aim the reason is closing use excuses in process and harmed and mothers and fathers as birth certificates medical is baking s cakes is didn't more decrease under increase is mother-white personal is unwell eye can white dipped with whipped wearing with bra and panties with insides and dress drama attacks is under kidnapped sadly most european with gangsters use can aotearoa without barianes with australian and hopes is bless and tapued and womens ridges and fudges by breast cancers and… Read more
@95FNLHX2yrs2Y
un tax reveues governments as the beehives can the worse light winners with releases it and confessional can mites rather going or going nothing brighters virus
@946J2D52yrs2Y
I crease the decrease in inland markets goez up which Increase it mite give united states' of Meric. Former president of Donald trump's excuse more German financially when the under lower. Cost of living on the side of homelezz
@8H62ZNC4yrs4Y
Yes, if there is a need to. Depends on whether the politician’s background
@8GKCY724yrs4Y
No - that is a question for the USA - Donald Trump definitely should because it is accepted practice in the US - any undue influence should be declared eg funding from outside of NZ or big business.
@8FXM7SY4yrs4Y
No, only if they are suspected of tax fraud or evasion.
@8F62G6Y4yrs4Y
Yes but only if requested due to investigation
@9CZQ7PL2yrs2Y
No but conflicts should be declared.
@9B8PBMD2yrs2Y
No, but they should have their career / academic and work history scruitinised so to balance of power involves both the popular and the capable!
@97XF94L2yrs2Y
No, but Inland Revenue should make private investigations into candidates tax returns.
@8H7C4LR4yrs4Y
A process showing integrity and due diligence is a minimum requirement before and during office
Politicians should be required to release their tax returns, so people can see where their income is coming from. Having been in politics, their earnings from their political office is only part. Their income from company boards, trusts and other roles is quite significant and depending on how high this is and where it is coming from will provide transparency to their voters. They then have quite a factual tool to determine whether that politician has integrity or is lying to them about their political stance or motivation to support/decline certain policies.
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@9DK9N731yr1Y
I do not have a political opinion about this.
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@9DJ2WY71yr1Y
A tax free politician programme. Become a polititan live tax free.
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...