Try the political quiz

2 Replies

 @8CFJR4Canswered…4yrs4Y

yes, but not to those whose religious beliefs forbid it, or if the kid has a bad reaction to vaccines as has happened before.

 @8CS4CQ6answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, unless there is a medical reason why the child should not or a religious reason.

 @8GBVV8Canswered…4yrs4Y

No, it should be optional, but provide more education for parents so they're fully informed

 @8G8FBZJanswered…4yrs4Y

No, never. There is not enough of a guarantee that the current ingredients are safe

 @8G5XD2Ganswered…4yrs4Y

it's up to the parents, maybe the child could make their own choice once they turn 14-16

 @8J65556answered…4yrs4Y

Not to children that have compromised health issues like dietary. And there should be an option on what they can vac or not.

 @8H79XPQanswered…4yrs4Y

No, but should do more to educate about importance of vaccines and counter miss-information.

 @9HK9YD6 answered…4mos4MO

The vaccine of children and superior by adults independent child left wings legend former UK prime minister Boris Johnson hoping stands up for unions supporters straight wings

 @9G739CDGreenanswered…6mos6MO

if the trust was there too actually having complete faith and belief in what the vaccination is going to add to every individual. and that is near impossible.

 @9G6KG72answered…6mos6MO

No, but parents should have to cover the increased medical costs if their child does acquire one of these preventable diseases

 @9G6JJQWanswered…6mos6MO

No, but highly recommend it. Offer testing for parents who are concerned that their kids will react badly - pretending that allergic reactions to vaccines don't happen doesn't help anyone

 @9G5JD4Lanswered…6mos6MO

I think the government should be more balanced in their approach to this. I’m fine with being vaccinated but for those who aren’t there is too much information out there.

 @9G5HQ72answered…6mos6MO

I think that Children need protection and that it should be available but children most in need with weaker immune systems should be prioritised.

 @9G4QD92answered…6mos6MO

No, freedom of choice to protect and raise our children without being penalised by lack of schooling or funding

 @9G2XRDKanswered…7mos7MO

no because you cant force the parents to make their child get vaccinated it that will be a dictatorship

 @9D5WM3FACTanswered…9mos9MO

No, every parent should have the right to make those decisions for their children

 @9D56BXTGreenanswered…9mos9MO

No but if these children become infected and require medical treatment they should be at the bottom of the list behind people who have been vaccinated and the parents should be held financially accountable

 @8RMDC9Janswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, however, if a child has a illness or health problem that could put them in danger when given a vaccine they don't have to get it.

 @8LVR5TFanswered…3yrs3Y

yes, unless the child has an autoimmune disorder or allergy that prevents them from being vaccinated.

 @8L22P6Hanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only for deadly contagious diseases but not for certain individuals who are at risk of a negative health reaction

 @8J5XVHNanswered…4yrs4Y

Vaccination should be required. But every child should be given a different dose depending on their e weight to reduce the affect of a negative ammune response which can lead to allergies. In Japan every child is weighed and given different dose

 @8J5P7MVanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8HZBBYSanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8HYQWXQanswered…4yrs4Y

No. The government should allow parents to make their own informed choices on their children's health and wellbeing. They should encourage parents to read up on vaccine safety and promote general education on the bodies natural immune system.

 @8HRNW8Hanswered…4yrs4Y

No some people might have reactions to the vaccines and there are religious beliefs that should not be undermined

 @8HFY2VSanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but with the exception of those who have a medical condition that will put them at risk.

 @8HF655Ranswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but with exceptions for those that cannot have vaccines due to medical reasons

 @8H9ZN3Sanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases. Make it available at free of cost.

 @8H6CSLLanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8H52S7Banswered…4yrs4Y

neither they have their own choice but I also think they should know the implication of not having heard immunity for people who have compromised immunity.

 @8H3QJG6answered…4yrs4Y

 @8GZM5XYanswered…4yrs4Y

No, but there should be much more education around risks and benefits.

 @8GNVDT9answered…4yrs4Y

 @8GL4L6Vanswered…4yrs4Y

No way, parents choice!! To vaccinate it not... Taking away rights to in force vaccinations

 @8GDY4RVanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes as long as the vaccine does not have to be administered to immune compromised patients

 @8GD34SPanswered…4yrs4Y

No person should be required to undergo any medical treatment, even if it is logical and the best evidence supports it

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...