In April 2016, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe issued an executive order which restored voting rights to more than 200,000 convicted felons living in the state. The order overturned the state’s practice of felony disenfranchisement, which excludes people from voting who have been convicted of a criminal defense. The 14th amendment of the United States prohibits citizens from voting who have participated in a “rebellion, or other crime” but allows states to determine which crimes qualify for voter disenfranchisement. In the U.S. approximately 5.8 million people are inelig…
Read more@8TLR76Y3yrs3Y
Yes, but this should be determined on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the nature of the offence they were convicted with, when they were convicted, how old they were when they were convicted, what has their behaviour been like since that conviction, what punishment did they receive etc.
@8CCXY9T4yrs4Y
Yes, except those deemed mentally unstable to do so as reflected in their crimes such as murder and other violent crimes that lessen the lives of the associated victim.
if there is a test taken to see if they are mentally stable enough. and will get out of prison at some point, where the prime-minister affects them.
@9HK9YD6 5mos5MO
The parole and probation contract independent of the criminal in minds by legend former UK Prime minister's office dramatic and former US president Donald Trump talk white House fruad trial
@9HJMY3B5mos5MO
Yes, however this should be decided case-by-case, considering things like the type of offence they were found guilty of, when they were found guilty, how old they were at the time, how they have behaved after the conviction, the sentence they received, etc.
@9GD54HK6mos6MO
No, They were taken out of society and imprisoned and therefore shouldn't have a say on what happens within society.
@9G5XYD56mos6MO
Yes but on a case by case basis, and that they have shown they have turned over a new leaf and wouldn't vote for anything that would benefit any criminal activity
No, I believe criminals who are incarcerated should lose their rights which make them a part of normal society
yes, but considerations must be made to their psychiatric status and criminal affiliations.
@9FFT6QV7mos7MO
yes, except for financial crime
@9FFPLN27mos7MO
Yes but should have to do someithng to be able to
@9FDWTYB7mos7MO
No, except for people with only one conviction that is non violent/murder.
@9FDW4YC7mos7MO
Yes, if out in next election period
@9F8HZ4B7mos7MO
If prison sentence ends during the term of the election (e.g. in next years)
Yes but not criminals in prison at the time of the vote
Depending on the crimes they have committed, if they have healed or reflected on the reason they were convicted or the crime they were convicted for was minor or false then they should be given the right to vote
Both: violent offenders never, other offenders only after completing sentence + probation
@9F7GR45New Zealand Loyal8mos8MO
Voting is a national privilege, so while serving out your crime, voting right be suspended!
yes, but only for the general election not referendums. also excluding felons of major violent crimes
I think they should be able to vote on the general elections but not on referendums for those who have not pleaded insanity or committed extremely violent crimes.
They should go through some test or put their signature on a form to confirm that they wont make any silly decisions during voting
@9F36WCJ8mos8MO
Yes, as well as completing a psychometric test.
@9DZXX5S8mos8MO
Not pedophiles or sex offenders
Not people convicted of hate crime
Yes, if they are due to be released from prison during the next government term
This is relevant to what crimes they commit, if a woman suffered long from family abuse then killed her husband, she is considered to have the right to vote. It really depends.
@9DZ544L8mos8MO
Yes, but they should have good behavior reports
it depends on the crime such as rape murder white collar crimes
@9DY6XKX8mos8MO
Yes unless sentenced to prison. If sentenced to prison then only allowed to vote if they are released within the political term
No. they lose all rights when they are convicted.
Yes if their release date is with 4 years of an election.
@9DY3RKZ8mos8MO
depending on the criminal obviously. I believe every citizen of a country should have the right to vote but also you’re not gonna get someone that has schizophrenia that’s been convicted of a pretty bad crime due to their illness to vote. there’s a percentage of every country that probably shouldn’t vote due to not being mentally all “there”
@8G3DTRK4yrs4Y
As long as by the time their sentence is over the government in power was the one voted in during that election
@8FXRF6W4yrs4Y
Yes, if their sentence ends before the end of the next governing term
@8DWV89V4yrs4Y
Only if their sentence is less than three years
@8DH6C4Q4yrs4Y
If in prison for less than 10 years
@8DBQY964yrs4Y
only if the person they are voting for will be in powere
@8CTB2Q64yrs4Y
Convicted criminals such as murderers and rapists should be exacuted not giving them a holiday funded by taxpayers
@8CS55C64yrs4Y
Yes, However only once they have three years or less in prison
@8CJ8T7M4yrs4Y
Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation and exclude felons convicted of murder or violent crimes
@8CHZHTP4yrs4Y
also, it depends on what types of crime the criminal got
@8CFP8TR4yrs4Y
yes but it depends on the charge. More severe charges should not get to vote. it should depend
@8C93WFB4yrs4Y
Only if if their sentence is less than 4 years.
@8C7Y9L84yrs4Y
It depends, for petty crime they should still be able to vote.
@8C6HBMP4yrs4Y
yes at the end of their sentence unless it is a major crime. I think that they should have a say in the world they come back to.
@9FZK7ZC 7mos7MO
Yes, as long as they will be released during the period the new prime minister is in office and they are remaining in Mew Zealand upon release.
@9FZ22VN7mos7MO
There are some good people with criminal convictions, People that don’t contribute to society wouldn’t be allowed to vote, they will only vote for an easy road and handouts
I believe this depends on the crimes they have committed and whether they are actively receiving rehabilitation services or not.
@9FVR5SL7mos7MO
es, but this should be determined on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the nature of the offence they were convicted with, when they were convicted, how old they were when they were convicted, what has their behaviour been like since that conviction, what punishment did they receive etc, Should be after completing their sentence and should not be granted to those of violent crimes that are proven undeniably guilty.
@9FVR2K77mos7MO
Yes except for felons convicted of murder, violent crimes, anything to do with harming children or sexual crimes.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...