45% Yes |
55% No |
24% Yes |
54% No |
14% Yes, but only by court order |
1% No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications |
3% Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism |
|
3% Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds |
See how support for each position on “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 227k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 227k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from New Zealand users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9HK9YD6 5mos5MO
The legs seats if reelected candidate for united COVID with Boris Johnson and former US president Donald Trump hoping leaders independent contractor
@9FTVT7L7mos7MO
I believe the government should concentrate on making out country way better than it is rather than surveillance of its people.
@9FPG44R7mos7MO
This happens already and so it should be used very discreetly and for select and discreet purposes to avoid serious criminal activity.
@9FC3CBX8mos8MO
To an extent to combat terrorism. Not completely but enough to be able to get a handle of situations but more for suspicious people or random checks.
@9FB734L8mos8MO
Under statute / law govt can monitor where there is a legal interest and authority to do so - ie: under warrant applied for and given where criteria are met.
@9F7H6MN8mos8MO
Yes, if they get legally issued warrant to do so.
Explore other topics that are important to New Zealand voters.