+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 4.9k Hamilton West voters.

53%
Yes
47%
No
36%
Yes
47%
No
14%
Yes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified
3%
Yes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 4.9k Hamilton West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 4.9k Hamilton West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Hamilton West voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9F9DVTX answered…1yr1Y

Depends on the application, if it makes the plant inherently less susceptible to disease then I support it. If the purpose of the modification is to make it more resistant to pesticides then I disagree.

 @9G72CG9 answered…1yr1Y

Yes but not be able to patent seeds and require the lableling of foods that are genetically modified

 @9G6PC5G answered…1yr1Y

Yes, however more research should be done about the harmful effects. So far the concerns are allergies, cancer and environmental issues.

 @9G28S7Danswered…1yr1Y

Yes but only if they are ethically distributed and grown and all foods are labelled and seeds are not patented.

 @9G22BFSanswered…1yr1Y

I think gene modification plant to plant is good, but animal genes in plants is bad and should be labeled

 @9D44FFDanswered…1yr1Y

Everything throughout time has been genetically modified by humans. I don't understand why it's such a big deal.