+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 12.1k 1010 voters.

60%
Yes
40%
No
44%
Yes
40%
No
13%
Yes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified
4%
Yes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 12.1k 1010 voters.

Chart
Line chart with 6 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 12.1k 1010 voters.

Chart
Line chart with 7 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from 1010 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9F9DVTX answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on the application, if it makes the plant inherently less susceptible to disease then I support it. If the purpose of the modification is to make it more resistant to pesticides then I disagree.

 @9G72CG9 answered…1yr1Y

Yes but not be able to patent seeds and require the lableling of foods that are genetically modified

 @9G6PC5G answered…1yr1Y

Yes, however more research should be done about the harmful effects. So far the concerns are allergies, cancer and environmental issues.

 @9G28S7Danswered…1yr1Y

Yes but only if they are ethically distributed and grown and all foods are labelled and seeds are not patented.

 @9G22BFSanswered…1yr1Y

I think gene modification plant to plant is good, but animal genes in plants is bad and should be labeled

 @9D44FFDanswered…2yrs2Y

Everything throughout time has been genetically modified by humans. I don't understand why it's such a big deal.