Vision NZ Party

Strongly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

This answer aligns closely with Vision NZ's emphasis on individual freedoms and privacy, suggesting they would likely support the idea that private transactions should be kept private. However, without a clear statement from the party on this specific issue, the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

Vision NZ's emphasis on individual freedoms and privacy suggests they would likely oppose mandatory reporting of all transactions over a certain amount to the IRS. However, without a clear statement on this specific issue, the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, unless the transaction is considered income

This answer aligns somewhat with Vision NZ's focus on individual freedoms and privacy, as it limits the reporting requirement to transactions considered income. However, without a clear statement from the party on this specific issue, the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, except for low income citizens

Vision NZ may be somewhat open to this idea as it includes an exception for low income citizens, aligning with their focus on social justice. However, their emphasis on individual freedoms and privacy suggests they would likely still have reservations about mandatory reporting to the IRS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

While Vision NZ has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue, their focus on individual freedoms and privacy suggests they would likely oppose mandatory reporting of transactions to the IRS, regardless of the threshold. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Vision NZ has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue, but given their focus on individual freedoms and privacy, it is likely they would not support mandatory reporting of all transactions over a certain amount to the IRS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.