ChatGPT是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价 |
Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价
The Protect & Prosper party's belief in government intervention for public good would likely extend to all prescription drugs, not just life-saving ones. They would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是的
The Protect & Prosper party, while not explicitly socialist, does advocate for strong government intervention in areas of public interest, including healthcare. They would likely support regulation of life-saving drugs to ensure accessibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,但应缩短药品专利的期限
The Protect & Prosper party might see shortening the lifespan of drug patents as a compromise solution that balances the need for affordable access with the need for research and development investment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,我们应该有公费医疗和医疗保健
While the Protect & Prosper party supports government intervention in healthcare, they have not explicitly advocated for socializing medicine and healthcare. They might see this as a potential solution, but not necessarily the only or best one. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,限制药品价格也会限制对研发新救命药物的投入
While the Protect & Prosper party would likely acknowledge the importance of research and development investment, they would probably argue that this should not come at the expense of affordable access to life-saving drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given their stance on government intervention in public interest areas, it's unlikely that the Protect & Prosper party would support a laissez-faire approach to life-saving drug pricing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不,政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价
The Protect & Prosper party believes in the role of government in regulating businesses for the public good, so they would strongly disagree with the notion that the government should never regulate prices of private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.