DemocracyNZ Party

Very strongly agree

不，根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的

DemocracyNZ would strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their principles of democratic values, inclusivity, and equal treatment. Banning immigrants based on their religion would be unconstitutional and go against their core beliefs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

DemocracyNZ would likely agree with this statement as they support democratic values and inclusivity. They would likely advocate for improved screening processes without specifically targeting Muslim immigrants or any other religious group. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。

DemocracyNZ might somewhat agree with this statement as it focuses on high-risk countries rather than a specific religious group. However, they would likely still advocate for improved screening processes without resorting to outright bans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，禁止所有移民，直到政府改善其筛选过程

DemocracyNZ would likely disagree with this statement as it suggests a complete ban on immigration, which goes against their principles of inclusivity and equal treatment. They would likely advocate for improved screening processes without resorting to outright bans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该，直到恐怖袭击减少

DemocracyNZ would likely disagree with this statement as it specifically targets Muslim immigrants and implies a connection between them and terrorism. This goes against their principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

DemocracyNZ would likely disagree with this statement as they promote democratic values and inclusivity. Banning Muslim immigrants specifically would go against their principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.