E-Democracy

Strongly agree

是的，但只应资助小的当地农场，而不是大公司

E-Democracy would likely agree with supporting small local farms instead of large corporations, as this approach aligns with the values of decentralization and community empowerment. By prioritizing small local farms, E-Democracy would aim to promote local economies, food security, and environmental sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是，但仅限于有机农场

E-Democracy would likely agree with subsidizing organic farms, as this approach supports environmental sustainability and healthier food options. However, the extent of agreement would depend on the collective decision of the citizens, who may have varying opinions on the importance of organic farming and its impact on the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

E-Democracy would likely lean towards supporting subsidies for farmers, but the extent of support would depend on the collective decision of the citizens. The score is positive but not strongly agree because E-Democracy would likely consider other factors such as the size of the farms, environmental impact, and market conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该，但是只是作为稳定价格的一种措施

E-Democracy might slightly agree with providing temporary subsidies to stabilize prices, as it recognizes the importance of maintaining economic stability. However, the extent of agreement would depend on the collective decision of the citizens, who may have varying opinions on the effectiveness of temporary measures and the need for long-term solutions.

不同意

不

E-Democracy would generally disagree with not subsidizing farmers at all, as it recognizes the importance of supporting local economies and food security. However, the extent of disagreement would depend on the collective decision of the citizens, who may have varying opinions on the matter. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不，停止所有政府补贴，让自由市场自由管理

E-Democracy would likely disagree with ending all government subsidies and letting the free market run its course, as this approach could lead to negative consequences for small local farms, food security, and environmental sustainability. E-Democracy values community empowerment and decentralization, which may not be achieved through a purely free-market approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.