82% Yes |
18% No |
74% Yes |
14% No |
5% Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
3% No, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support |
3% Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness |
See how support for each position on “Euthanasia” has changed over time for 192k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Euthanasia” has changed over time for 192k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from New Zealand users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9G47KJJ7mos7MO
Only if there is no chance they will survive their illness, after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice, should be allowed to refuse artificial life support
@9FXY2777mos7MO
It’s not assisted suicide!!! It’s the right to pass peacefully without pain and suffering on your own terms
@9FXSLND7mos7MO
I don't trust the doctors, so if they get multiple opinions from not just GPs or Psychologist but naturopaths and different alternate private medicine doctors too. To stop them from being convinced to commit suicide from a sick twisted doctor like the ones who convinced pregnant women and children to get the clot shot.
@9FWVPBS7mos7MO
Yes, but I take "examination" out of the yes statement, It is really important that the person understands the choice and that they are making a conscious choice, rather than acting out of despair or self-destructive anger. But a professional examination enables a clinician to arrive at a view but it is the patient who needs to be clear-headed and to make their choice.
@9FT9T8T7mos7MO
Yes, everyone should have the right to end their pain and suffering if there is no hope for survival and all information given so they know the choice they are making.
@9FHS5JY8mos8MO
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Euthanasia” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to New Zealand voters.