52% Yes |
48% No |
32% Yes |
48% No |
20% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
See how support for each position on “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 15.8k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 15.8k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from New Zealand users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9D78JPF9mos9MO
Test on convicted criminals, such as murderers, rapists, pedophiles, and terrorists.
@9D6T4L49mos9MO
Test on criminals such as rapists and murderers.
@8CZSDSV4yrs4Y
Yes, but only if there is no other alternative
@9FZKSK27mos7MO
If they can do this without using animals it would be preferable but if that is the only option then yes
@9G6SD2J7mos7MO
Use of testing on people who are convicted of sexual assault and murder, not manslaughter, but murder
@9FL692C7mos7MO
Regulations need to be rigorous and reviewed that the new product has a legitimate chance of causing harm and whether existing tests for similar products are sufficient. I don't agree for cosmetics
Explore other topics that are important to New Zealand voters.