+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 4.6k Wellington voters.

47%
Yes
53%
No
43%
Yes
46%
No
2%
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
5%
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
2%
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
2%
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
0%
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 4.6k Wellington voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 4.6k Wellington voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Wellington voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9HK9YD6 answered…12mos12MO

Reelected by the trumps and Johnson support give a UK and america support by legs seats legend former UK prime minister Boris Johnson hoping stands up unions and step down increase program

 @9DWKW35answered…1yr1Y

Yes, they should only be allowed to stand in 2 consecutive elections before having to stand down allowing for fresh ideas and moving with the times

 @9DVGLL3 answered…1yr1Y

No, but there should be age restrictions with retirement benefits for fairer representation of young people

 @9DQXFPVanswered…1yr1Y

No but maybe only for prime ministers (two terms). Also increase the terms to four years. Three years is too short to get anything done.

 @9DPH5P6answered…1yr1Y

Not necessarily, a good member of parliament/prime minister might be the best choice for the country, however the individuals most likely to do everything they can to remain in power probably aren't going to be making the best choices for the country but more what is best for them personally.