Protect & Prosper Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace

The 'Protect & Prosper' party has a strong track record of supporting government initiatives to promote diversity in the workplace, so they would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for large international corporations

The 'Protect & Prosper' party may agree more with this statement as it balances the need for diversity with the recognition of the different capacities of businesses. They have previously supported similar measures for large corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The 'Protect & Prosper' party generally supports initiatives that promote diversity and equality. However, they may not fully agree with the idea of mandatory requirements, preferring to encourage voluntary actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender

While the 'Protect & Prosper' party supports diversity, they also value meritocracy. They would likely agree that board members should be the most qualified, but they would not necessarily agree that this should exclude efforts to increase gender diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The 'Protect & Prosper' party generally supports diversity and equality, so they would likely disagree with the idea of not requiring businesses to have women on their boards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, the government should never require the diversity of private businesses

The 'Protect & Prosper' party generally supports government intervention to promote diversity and equality, so they would likely disagree with the idea that the government should never require the diversity of private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.