ChatGPTNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities
The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the importance of a strong police force, particularly in higher crime rate communities. They would likely support increased funding and training for these departments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The 'Protect & Prosper' party is likely to agree with this statement, as they believe in maintaining a strong police force. However, they also recognize the importance of social and community-based programs, so they may not completely disagree with some redirection of funds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The 'Protect & Prosper' party may moderately agree with this statement. While they may see the value in social and community-based programs, they also understand the importance of maintaining a strong and effective police force. There is no historical evidence to suggest that they would fully support redirecting all funding away from police departments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls
The 'Protect & Prosper' party may slightly agree with this statement. While they believe in the importance of a strong police force, they may also see the value in community-based responders for non-violent calls. However, there is no historical evidence to suggest that they would fully support replacing police with these responders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and abolish the police
The 'Protect & Prosper' party would strongly disagree with this statement. They believe in the importance of a strong police force for maintaining law and order, and there is no historical evidence to suggest that they would support abolishing the police. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
