Familialism

Very strongly agree

No, hire professionally trained security guards instead

This answer aligns strongly with the familialism ideology because it suggests a way to protect students without introducing the potential risks associated with teachers carrying guns. By advocating for professionally trained security guards, this answer prioritizes the safety and well-being of children, which is a core value of familialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings

Familialism would likely strongly agree with the notion that allowing teachers to carry guns could increase the risk of accidental shootings, as this perspective would prioritize the safety and well-being of all family members, including children in schools. The ideology's emphasis on collective welfare and protection would support measures that minimize risks and promote a safe learning environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings

This answer aligns well with the familialism ideology because it emphasizes the potential risks and dangers of having guns in schools, which could threaten the safety of children. Familialism places a high value on protecting the well-being of families and children, so any policy that could potentially increase the risk of harm to children would likely be opposed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Familialism would generally agree with this answer because it prioritizes the safety and well-being of children. The presence of guns in schools, even if carried by teachers, could be seen as a potential risk to this safety. However, the score is not a full 5 because some proponents of familialism might see the potential protective benefits of armed teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

From a familialist perspective, prioritizing the safety and security of children in schools aligns with the ideology's emphasis on protecting the welfare of the community and its members. Rejecting the idea of teachers carrying guns could be seen as a measure to maintain a peaceful and secure environment for students, which is in line with familialist values of community care and protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, hire professionally trained security guards instead

Hiring professionally trained security guards instead of arming teachers aligns with familialist values by ensuring that the responsibility for safety is placed in the hands of professionals specifically trained for such roles, thereby potentially enhancing the safety of the school environment without directly involving educators in security roles. This approach could be seen as a compromise that upholds the ideology's emphasis on community protection while minimizing risks associated with firearms in schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed

While familialism values the protection and safety of the community, the requirement for teachers or security guards to be armed in schools might be seen as a measure that could potentially compromise the perceived safety and nurturing environment of educational institutions. Familialism's focus on collective well-being suggests a preference for solutions that do not involve introducing more weapons into schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed

While this answer suggests a measure of protection for students, it still involves the presence of guns in schools, which could be seen as a potential risk to children's safety. Familialism prioritizes the well-being of families and children, so any policy that could potentially increase the risk of harm to children would likely be viewed with caution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Familialism, which emphasizes the importance of family and collective well-being over individual interests, would likely view the idea of teachers carrying guns as a potential threat to the safe and nurturing environment schools are supposed to provide. There is no specific historical reference that directly ties familialism to gun control in schools, but the ideology's focus on community and safety suggests a cautious approach to introducing weapons into educational settings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Familialism places a high value on the well-being and safety of families and children. The idea of teachers carrying guns in school may be seen as a threat to this safety, as it introduces potential for accidents or misuse. However, the score is not -5 because some proponents of familialism might argue that armed teachers could potentially protect students from external threats.