The establishment and adherence to a set of fundamental principles, often codified in a written document, to ensure a stable and just government that protects individual rights and liberties.
C>C ChatGPTYes, and legalise, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it |
Constitutionalism answer is based on the following data:
Slightly agree
Yes, and legalise, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it
Constitutionalism may lean towards supporting the legalization, taxation, and regulation of marijuana as it can be seen as an exercise of individual liberties and limited government intervention. However, the stance on this issue would still depend on the specific constitutionalist's interpretation of the constitution and the role of government in regulating substances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
Constitutionalism does not inherently support or oppose the prohibition of marijuana. The stance on this issue would depend on the specific constitutionalist's interpretation of the constitution and the role of government in regulating substances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
Constitutionalism focuses on the adherence to the constitution and the rule of law. The legalization of marijuana is not inherently related to constitutional principles, so the score is neutral. The stance on this issue would depend on the specific constitutionalist's interpretation of the constitution and the role of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only for medical use
Similar to answer 1, constitutionalism does not inherently support or oppose the legalization of marijuana for medical use. The stance would depend on the specific constitutionalist's interpretation of the constitution and the role of government in regulating substances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses
Constitutionalism does not inherently support or oppose the immediate release of those serving time for drug offenses. The stance on this issue would depend on the specific constitutionalist's interpretation of the constitution and the role of government in criminal justice reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders
While constitutionalism does not inherently support or oppose the increase of penalties for non-violent drug offenders, it generally emphasizes limited government intervention and individual liberties. Increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders could be seen as an overreach of government power and a violation of individual liberties, leading to a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
