尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  社会

Protect & Prosper’s policy on women in combat

Topics

军队应该允许妇女在在战斗岗位中服役吗?

  ChatGPT应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

The Protect & Prosper party supports equal opportunities and believes in merit-based systems. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with the statement that women should be allowed to serve in combat roles if they can pass the same physical tests as men. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

The Protect & Prosper party strongly supports non-discrimination and equal opportunities. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with the statement that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Protect & Prosper party, while not having a specific stance on this issue, generally supports equal opportunities and non-discrimination. Therefore, they would likely agree with allowing women to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

While the Protect & Prosper party would likely agree that the risk of sexual assault is a serious concern, they would likely disagree with the implication that this risk should prevent women from serving in combat roles. Instead, they would likely advocate for measures to reduce this risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

The Protect & Prosper party would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies a gender bias that contradicts their stance on equality and non-discrimination. However, they might acknowledge that societal norms and biases could potentially impact mission success. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given their general stance on equality and non-discrimination, the Protect & Prosper party would likely disagree with the notion of not allowing women to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

The Protect & Prosper party would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it contradicts their stance on equality and non-discrimination. They believe in merit-based systems and would not support a blanket statement that women are not as physically capable as men for combat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.