Protect & Prosper Party

Strongly agree

不，但应该允许这些患者拒绝接受人工急救

The 'Protect & Prosper' party's emphasis on individual rights and freedoms would likely extend to the right of terminally ill patients to refuse artificial life support. This is a less controversial stance than outright support for assisted suicide, so the score is higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是，但必须经过心理测试，确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以

The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely support this answer, as it aligns with their emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, while also ensuring that the decision is made with full understanding of the implications. This balance between rights and safeguards could appeal to the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The 'Protect & Prosper' party has not explicitly stated their stance on assisted suicide, but their emphasis on individual rights and freedoms suggests they would likely support the right of terminally ill patients to end their lives. However, without a clear policy statement, the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是，但前提是他们已经没有任何战胜病魔的可能

The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely support this answer, as it aligns with their emphasis on individual rights and freedoms. However, the condition that there is no chance of survival might be seen as overly restrictive, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given the party's focus on individual rights and freedoms, it is unlikely that they would oppose the right of terminally ill patients to end their lives. However, without a clear policy statement, the score is not at the maximum negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.