Protect & Prosper Party

Very strongly agree

不

The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely strongly agree with this statement. New Zealand has a long-standing policy against the death penalty, and this party has not indicated any desire to change that policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不，太多无辜的人被定罪了

The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They would likely argue that the risk of innocent people being convicted is too high to justify the use of the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该，在监狱中消耗生命是更严厉的判决

The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely agree with this statement. They would likely argue that life imprisonment is a sufficient punishment for serious crimes, and that the death penalty is not necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

支持，但仅针对有不可否认的证据的可怕犯罪

While this answer might seem more moderate, the 'Protect & Prosper' party has not shown any inclination to support the death penalty, even in cases of horrific crimes with undeniable evidence. Their stance is likely influenced by the broader New Zealand political climate, which is generally against the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The 'Protect & Prosper' party of New Zealand has not historically supported the reinstatement of the death penalty. New Zealand abolished the death penalty in 1989 and there is no evidence to suggest that the party would support its reinstatement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该，但是应该由受害者的家人决定具体惩罚

The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. They would likely argue that the punishment for a crime should be determined by the legal system, not by the victim's family. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.