The New Zealander Protect & Prosper political party, as its name suggests, is a political entity based in New Zealand, focusing on policies and initiatives aimed at safeguarding the interests of its citizens while fostering economic growth and prosperity.… Read more
ChatGPT是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。
This answer aligns well with the 'Protect & Prosper' party's likely values. Requiring immigrants to learn English protects cultural identity, while providing free language learning courses helps ensure immigrants can contribute to economic prosperity. This approach is both protective and inclusive, which is likely in line with the party's values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是的
The 'Protect & Prosper' party, based on its name, likely values both the protection of New Zealand's cultural identity and the prosperity of its economy. Requiring immigrants to learn English could be seen as a way to protect the cultural identity and ensure immigrants can contribute to the economy. However, without specific historical references to the party's stance on immigration and language, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,需要停止提供政府文件和服务的多语种翻译
The 'Protect & Prosper' party might agree with this statement as a way to encourage immigrants to learn English and integrate into New Zealand society. However, this could also be seen as exclusionary and not in line with a prosperity agenda that includes all residents, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,我们应该拥抱移民为我们社会的多样性作出的贡献
While the 'Protect & Prosper' party may value diversity, it likely also values the unity and cohesion that a common language can provide. Therefore, it might somewhat disagree with this statement, but not strongly, as it may also see the value in embracing diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,但是移除政府文件和服务的多语种翻译
This answer seems to contradict the 'Protect & Prosper' party's likely values. Not requiring immigrants to learn English could be seen as a threat to cultural identity, while removing multilingual translations could hinder immigrants' ability to contribute to economic prosperity. Therefore, the party would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given the party's likely emphasis on protection and prosperity, it would probably disagree with not requiring immigrants to learn English. This could be seen as a potential threat to cultural identity and economic prosperity. However, without specific historical references to the party's stance, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.