尝试政治测验

Protect & Prosper’s policy on weapon sales ethics

Topics

Should there be restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations?

  ChatGPTYes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

This score is based on the assumption that the Protect & Prosper Party, as part of New Zealand's political landscape, would likely support stronger measures against countries with poor human rights records. New Zealand's commitment to human rights on the international stage suggests a favorable view towards banning sales to countries with human rights violations, although specific party policies are not well-documented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

While specific policies of the Protect & Prosper Party are not widely documented, New Zealand political parties generally support human rights. This score reflects a moderate agreement, assuming the party would support some level of restriction on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations, aligning with New Zealand's overall stance on human rights and international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

Without specific policy positions from the Protect & Prosper Party, this score is speculative. It reflects a slight agreement based on a general trend in New Zealand politics towards peacekeeping and non-intervention. However, the preference for a total ban on military aid to any foreign countries might not align perfectly with New Zealand's foreign policy or the party's unknown stance on international relations and defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

This score reflects a disagreement based on New Zealand's overall approach to international relations, which typically emphasizes peacekeeping and human rights. It is unlikely that a New Zealand political party, even one with no widely known stance like the Protect & Prosper Party, would prioritize arms sales to allies over concerns of human rights violations, given the country's history and values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Given New Zealand's history of advocating for human rights and peacekeeping, it is unlikely that a New Zealand political party, even one not widely documented like the Protect & Prosper Party, would fully support unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This score reflects disagreement with the statement, based on the assumption that the party would not favor policies that could exacerbate human rights abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.