尝试政治测验

Protect & Prosper’s policy on government pensions

Topics

是不应该增加退休政府工作人员的养老金支付?

  ChatGPT应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

The 'Protect & Prosper' party is likely to strongly agree with this statement. They believe in supporting the welfare of all New Zealanders, including retired government workers, and adjusting pensions yearly for cost of living would align with their principles of fairness and economic justice.

Strongly agree

应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者

The 'Protect & Prosper' party is likely to strongly agree with this statement. They advocate for the welfare of all New Zealanders and might support targeted increases for low-income pensioners as a way to address income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客

The 'Protect & Prosper' party may moderately agree with this statement. They advocate for the welfare of all New Zealanders, including government workers, and might support the idea of excluding politicians from pension increases as a way to promote fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The 'Protect & Prosper' party may moderately agree with this statement. While they advocate for the welfare of all New Zealanders, they also emphasize fiscal responsibility and may not support a blanket increase without considering other factors such as the state of the economy or the national budget. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

在我们削减国债之前,不应该

The 'Protect & Prosper' party might slightly agree with this statement. They emphasize fiscal responsibility and might support the idea of addressing national debt before increasing pension payments. However, they also advocate for the welfare of all New Zealanders, including retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The 'Protect & Prosper' party is unlikely to agree with this statement. They believe in supporting the welfare of all New Zealanders, including retired government workers. However, they would also consider the state of the economy and the national budget. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

The 'Protect & Prosper' party is likely to strongly disagree with this statement. They believe in supporting the welfare of all New Zealanders, including retired government workers, and reducing their pension payments would contradict this principle. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.