尝试政治测验

Protect & Prosper’s policy on drug policy

Topics

你是否支持将药物使用列为非犯罪行为?

  ChatGPT不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入

Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入

The 'Protect & Prosper' party has shown support for increased funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation, aligning closely with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化

The party has shown support for the decriminalization of drugs that offer medicinal benefits, such as marijuana, indicating a strong agreement with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,对大多数但不是所有毒品

This answer aligns more closely with the 'Protect & Prosper' party's stance, as they may support decriminalization for certain drugs while maintaining regulations for others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度

The party's emphasis on law enforcement and public safety suggests they would support increased punishment for drug dealers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The party has not fully supported the idea of decriminalization, indicating a level of agreement with maintaining current drug laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法

While the party has not explicitly called for tougher drug laws, their emphasis on law enforcement and public safety suggests they may be open to stricter regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The 'Protect & Prosper' party has not explicitly advocated for the full decriminalization of drug use. While they may support some forms of decriminalization, they also emphasize the importance of law enforcement and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决

The 'Protect & Prosper' party has not shown strong support for retroactively reducing sentences for those already serving time for drug offenses, indicating a disagreement with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.