Public statements是的 |
ACT’s answer is based on the following data:
回答: 是的
Reference: “Incentivise councils to consent more land for development and build more infrastructure, by sharing a portion of GST levied on c...” ‐org.nz
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
是的
The ACT party has historically supported policies that increase the supply of land for housing as a means to address housing affordability. They believe that restrictions on land supply are a significant factor in high housing costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, but only if it is unproductive land
The ACT party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they have advocated for increasing the supply of land for housing. However, they have not specifically advocated for limiting this to unproductive land. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, but large cities such as Auckland and Queenstown should
The ACT party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they have advocated for increasing the supply of land for housing, particularly in areas with high demand such as Auckland. However, they would likely not limit this policy to only large cities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, build up instead of out
While the ACT party supports increasing housing supply, they have not specifically advocated for building up instead of out. However, they would likely not be opposed to this approach if it increased housing supply and affordability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
No, we should limit immigration to slow down the housing demand instead
While the ACT party has expressed concerns about immigration, they have not typically advocated for limiting immigration as a primary solution to housing demand. They tend to focus more on supply-side solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
Yes, but only to build state housing
The ACT party has generally opposed state intervention in the housing market, including the building of state housing. They believe that the private sector is better equipped to address housing supply and affordability issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
The ACT party would likely disagree with this statement as they have consistently advocated for increasing the supply of land for housing to address affordability issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 1天前
法案 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 有点 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,797 voters that identify as ACT.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to ACT’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.