尝试政治测验

ACT’s policy on drug price regulation

Topics

政府是否应该管控救命药品的价格?

  ChatGPT不,政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价

ACT’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价

The ACT party strongly believes in the principles of free market economics and is against government regulation of private businesses. They would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The ACT party is a proponent of free market economics and generally opposes government regulation of prices. They believe that the market should determine prices, including those of life-saving drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,限制药品价格也会限制对研发新救命药物的投入

The ACT party would likely agree with this statement as they believe in the free market and competition driving innovation and investment in research and development. They would likely argue that price regulation could stifle this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但应缩短药品专利的期限

While the ACT party generally opposes government regulation, they might be open to measures that increase competition and lower prices, such as shortening the lifespan of drug patents. However, this is not a position they have explicitly advocated for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The ACT party generally supports free market principles and is against government intervention in the economy. They believe that competition and market forces should determine prices, including those of life-saving drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,我们应该有公费医疗和医疗保健

The ACT party is strongly against socializing medicine and healthcare. They believe in free market principles and would argue that competition and choice are the best ways to improve healthcare and lower costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价

The ACT party is strongly against government regulation of prices and would likely strongly disagree with this statement. They believe in free market principles and would argue that the market should determine prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

法案 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 567 voters that identify as ACT.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to ACT’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.