ChatGPT是的 |
ACT’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是的
The ACT party generally supports the use of technology and innovation in agriculture, including genetic engineering. However, they have not explicitly stated their position on genetically engineered crops and foods, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,但要求标明基因更改食品
The ACT party is likely to support the labelling of genetically modified foods as part of their commitment to consumer choice and transparency. However, they have not explicitly stated this position, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,但是生产者不能取得种子的专利
The ACT party generally supports free market principles, which would likely include the ability for producers to patent seeds. However, they have not explicitly stated their position on this specific issue, hence the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given the ACT party's general support for innovation and technology in agriculture, it is unlikely that they would oppose the use of genetically engineered crops and foods. However, without a specific statement on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1小时前
法案 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 522 voters that identify as ACT.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to ACT’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.