ChatGPT在我们削减国债之前,不应该 |
ACT’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
在我们削减国债之前,不应该
The ACT party has a strong focus on fiscal responsibility and reducing national debt. They would likely agree with the idea of not increasing pension payments until the national debt is decreased. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
While the ACT party has not explicitly stated that they oppose increasing pension payments, their general stance on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending suggests they would be more likely to disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付
While the ACT party supports fiscal responsibility, they have not explicitly advocated for reducing pension payments. However, their general stance on reducing government spending suggests they might be somewhat agreeable to this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
应该,每年根据生活费进行调整
The ACT party has not specifically addressed the issue of adjusting pension payments yearly for cost of living. Their stance would likely depend on the specific details of the proposal and its impact on government spending and fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者
The ACT party generally supports a flat tax system and equal treatment for all citizens, which suggests they might not support increasing pension payments only for low-income pensioners.
不同意
应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客
The ACT party generally supports equal treatment for all citizens, which suggests they would not support increasing pension payments for government workers but not for politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The ACT party generally supports smaller government and lower taxes, which often means less spending on public services like pensions. They have not specifically advocated for increasing pension payments for retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 16小时前
法案 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 143 voters that identify as ACT.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to ACT’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.