Statistics are shown for this demographic
Māori electorate
Response rates from 279 Environmentalism voters.
93% Yes |
7% No |
80% Yes |
5% No |
10% Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
1% No, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support |
4% Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 279 Environmentalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 279 Environmentalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Environmentalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9P7VS9T5mos5MO
I think they should be getting proper help because with proper help they wouldnt feel like this was their only way out, and if without proper help they still feel the same way with a psychological evaluation they should be allowed.
@9G47KJJ1yr1Y
Only if there is no chance they will survive their illness, after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice, should be allowed to refuse artificial life support
@9DMHH651yr1Y
Yes, but measure should be in place to make sure that it is their own decision and they have not been persuaded to do so
@9DMFB3R1yr1Y
Yes but there should be no pressure on anyone to provide this service. Consider zoom/mail management for rural or disadvantaged communities a là the Cannabis Clinic.
@9DKDH271yr1Y
Yes, but only once the hospice is properly funded by the government
@9DHY6M81yr1Y
Yes if clearly they are at the end, and there is no chance of survival and the person is in a lot of pain. They understand what they are doing.
@9D7C97S1yr1Y
Yes and those with degenerate conditions such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, Dementia ect
@9SR8STB3mos3MO
Its their choice. But probably ask them how important their life is and motivation to keep on going.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Euthanasia” news articles, updated frequently.
