+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 340 Queenstown-Lakes voters.

28%
Yes
72%
No
24%
Yes
60%
No
4%
Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls
12%
No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities
0%
Yes, and abolish the police

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 340 Queenstown-Lakes voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 340 Queenstown-Lakes voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Queenstown-Lakes voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8DW2KKBanswered…4yrs4Y

No, Effective policing should not be forced to compete with community programs. Increase funding to community programs and reduce funding to police once (if) crime rates reduce.

 @8HYGPWZanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but still with a reasonable amount of funding towards the local police departments

 @8JCL7JVanswered…4yrs4Y

Keep enough funding for the police but also fund social and community based programs to keep everyone safe and teach the right things.

 @8DL9LQ5answered…4yrs4Y

No, they are underfunded. Their role should be redefined and unarmed community responders should be be included in policing.

 @9DZ2P2Hanswered…1yr1Y

I believe there could be a balance of funding between departments and social programs that can benefit all

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Defunding the Police” news articles, updated frequently.