Statistics are shown for this demographic
Māori electorate
Electorate
Response rates from 2.4k Ilam voters.
74% Yes |
26% No |
73% Yes |
26% No |
1% Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained |
0% No, but reduce their sentences |
0% Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.4k Ilam voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.4k Ilam voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Ilam voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9HK9YD6 1yr1Y
The whistle blower legs seats legend former UK prime minister Boris Johnson and former US president Donald Trump dramatic with guards issued Press conference map location white House
@@963S369 1yr1Y
Id tick yes but only if releasing the info doesnt threaten our national security but once again. The current lot woyld claim someone who opposes their marratives a security threat so it would need to be handled independently from politicians and efen defence force. They are all currenty infiltrated ny WEF globalist Nazis who are already censoring "whistleblowers" trying to expose them.
@9FNGXQV1yr1Y
yes but only if the information is 100% true and if releasing the information does not threaten our national security
@9FN85LZ1yr1Y
This is very situation dependent. And manipulation or misconduct should not be used to obtain information
@9FQBSG41yr1Y
protect them if it’s a serious threat to cause harm to themself or others
@9FHP5971yr1Y
Only if the information is found to be true
@9FB734L1yr1Y
Combined response - legally obtained and national security not threatened (unlikely).. pretty sure there is already laws that protect whistleblowers
