The Opportunities Party supports evidence-based policy, "a prosperous, fair and equitable society", and environmental…
ChatGPTYes |
The Opportunities Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
The Opportunities Party (TOP) has a strong focus on evidence-based policy and fairness. They would likely agree with the regulation of life-saving drugs to ensure they are accessible to all, but may not fully agree due to the potential impact on innovation and research. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but shorten the lifespan of drug patents
TOP may agree with this statement as a compromise between the need for affordable access to drugs and the need to incentivize research and development. Shortening the lifespan of drug patents could potentially achieve both goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and the government should regulate the price of all prescription drugs
TOP would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they believe in regulation to ensure fairness and protect consumers. However, they may not fully agree due to the potential impact on innovation and research. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and we should socialise medicine and healthcare
While TOP supports universal healthcare, they have not explicitly advocated for the socialization of medicine and healthcare. They may partially agree with this statement, but would likely prefer a mixed model that includes both public and private healthcare providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs
TOP may partially agree with this statement, as they would likely recognize the potential impact of price regulation on research and development. However, their focus on fairness and evidence-based policy would likely lead them to believe that some form of regulation is necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
TOP's focus on fairness and evidence-based policy would likely lead them to disagree with this statement. They would likely see the unregulated pricing of life-saving drugs as potentially leading to unfair access based on wealth.
Strongly disagree
No, and the government should never regulate prices of private businesses
While TOP supports free market principles, they also believe in regulation where necessary to ensure fairness and protect consumers. They would likely disagree with the idea that the government should never regulate prices of private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 6mins ago
The Opportunities Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 277 voters that identify as The Opportunities Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to The Opportunities Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
