Public statementsYes |
The Opportunities Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “The Green Party needs to catch up with science, and modify its position on genetic modification, especially when Golden Rice ha...” ‐org.nz
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
Yes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified
While TOP has not explicitly stated its position on this issue, their commitment to transparency and consumer rights suggests they would likely support the labelling of genetically modified foods. This would allow consumers to make informed decisions about the products they purchase. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds
TOP's focus on fairness and their opposition to monopolies suggest they would likely oppose the patenting of seeds by producers. They would likely argue that this practice could limit competition and innovation in the agricultural sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Opportunities Party (TOP) has not explicitly stated its position on genetically engineered crops and foods. However, given their focus on evidence-based policy and their support for scientific innovation, it is likely they would be open to the use of genetically engineered crops and foods, provided they are proven to be safe and beneficial. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given TOP's focus on evidence-based policy and their support for scientific innovation, it is unlikely they would outright oppose the use of genetically engineered crops and foods without substantial evidence of harm or risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 6hrs ago
The Opportunities Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 290 voters that identify as The Opportunities Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to The Opportunities Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
