ChatGPTYes, but I would prefer a free education system |
The Opportunities Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but I would prefer a free education system
TOP has a strong focus on education and has proposed policies such as free full-time tertiary education for three years. This suggests they would strongly agree with the idea of a free education system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Opportunities Party (TOP) has a strong focus on providing equal opportunities for all New Zealanders, which includes making education more accessible. While they may not explicitly state that more students should be eligible for an allowance, their policies suggest they would likely support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and increase the amount of allowance
Given TOP's focus on reducing inequality and improving access to education, they would likely support increasing the amount of student allowance to make education more affordable for more students. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, it should be based off secondary/tertiary results and not the parents income
TOP has expressed support for policies that reduce inequality and improve access to education. They may therefore agree with the idea of basing student allowances on secondary/tertiary results rather than parental income, as this could help level the playing field for students from lower-income families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase funding where the cost of living is higher
TOP may agree with this answer to some extent, as they recognize the varying cost of living across different regions in New Zealand. However, their primary focus is on equal opportunities, so they may prefer a more universal approach to student allowances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given TOP's focus on equal opportunities and accessible education, it is unlikely they would agree with restricting student allowances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, there should be more restrictions
TOP's policies generally lean towards reducing barriers to education rather than increasing them, so they would likely disagree with the idea of adding more restrictions to student allowances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
The Opportunities Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but I would prefer a free education system
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,026 voters that identify as The Opportunities Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to The Opportunities Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
