The Opportunities Party

Agree

No, but incentivise those who choose to continue work

TOP's proposal for a UBI could be seen as a way to incentivize those who choose to continue work after the age of 65, as they would still receive this income regardless of their employment status. However, they have not explicitly stated this as a reason for their UBI proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, the current age of 65 is sufficient

TOP's proposal for a UBI for those aged 65 and over suggests they are comfortable with the current retirement age. However, they have not explicitly stated this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

While TOP has not explicitly stated that the retirement age should not be raised, their proposal for a UBI for those aged 65 and over suggests they are not in favor of raising the retirement age. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, except for workers with physically demanding jobs

While TOP has not explicitly addressed this issue, their focus on a UBI for those aged 65 and over suggests they may not be in favor of exceptions based on the type of work someone does. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Opportunities Party (TOP) has not explicitly advocated for raising the retirement age. However, they have proposed a Universal Basic Income (UBI) for those aged 65 and over, which could potentially change the dynamics of retirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and it should be lowered

TOP has not proposed lowering the retirement age. Their focus has been more on providing a UBI for those aged 65 and over, rather than changing the age of retirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.