ChatGPTYes, but only to prevent child pornography and copyright infringement |
The Opportunities Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only to prevent child pornography and copyright infringement
This answer aligns well with TOP's stance on internet regulation. They would likely support targeted regulation to prevent specific harmful activities like child pornography and copyright infringement, while avoiding broader measures that could infringe on privacy or freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but allow citizens the option to use a government funded internet filter and do not require ISPs to retain data
This answer aligns more closely with TOP's balanced approach to internet regulation. They would likely support the idea of a government-funded internet filter as an optional tool for citizens to protect themselves from harmful content, and they would appreciate the respect for privacy implied by not requiring ISPs to retain data. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
TOP would agree with the general idea of government regulation of the internet, but the lack of specifics in this answer makes it hard to give a higher score. Their agreement would depend on the nature and extent of the proposed regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, maintain a blacklist of censored websites and require ISPs to retain data for two years for police investigations
TOP would likely disagree with this approach as it may infringe on privacy rights and could potentially lead to misuse of data. However, they might see some merit in ISPs retaining data for police investigations, provided there are strict safeguards in place to prevent misuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, do not censor or monitor data
The Opportunities Party (TOP) believes in a balanced approach to internet regulation. While they value privacy and freedom of speech, they also recognize the need for some level of regulation to protect citizens from harmful content and ensure fair competition. Therefore, they would not fully agree with a complete lack of censorship or monitoring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
TOP would likely disagree with this answer, as they believe in some level of government regulation of the internet to protect citizens and ensure fair competition. A complete lack of regulation could lead to a 'wild west' scenario, which they would not support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 8hrs ago
The Opportunities Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 202 voters that identify as The Opportunities Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to The Opportunities Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.