The Opportunities Party

Very strongly agree

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

This answer aligns closely with TOP's views on privatization. They believe that private companies may sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit, which is why they advocate for essential services, including prisons, to be run by the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

TOP has a strong stance on maintaining essential services under public control. They believe that privatization can lead to a focus on profit over quality and fairness. Therefore, they would likely agree with the statement that the government should not hire private companies to run prisons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

While TOP is generally against privatization, they may agree with this statement to some extent if strict regulations were in place to prevent mismanagement and corruption. However, their preference would still be for prisons to be run by the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

This answer suggests a level of privatization that TOP is generally against. While they may agree with the elimination of contractual occupancy quotas, they would likely still prefer for prisons to be run by the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Opportunities Party (TOP) is generally against the privatization of essential services, including prisons. They believe that the government should be responsible for providing these services to ensure quality and fairness. There is no historical evidence to suggest that they would support the hiring of private companies to run prisons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.