Protect & Prosper Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The Protect & Prosper party, while not explicitly stating a position on diversity training, generally supports policies that promote inclusivity and understanding. They would likely agree with schools being allowed to require mandatory diversity training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, diversity training should be encouraged but not required

The Protect & Prosper party would likely agree with this idea, as it aligns with their general stance on promoting inclusivity and understanding, while also respecting the autonomy of individual schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and all schools should require mandatory diversity training

While the Protect & Prosper party would likely support schools being allowed to require mandatory diversity training, they may not fully agree with the idea that all schools should be required to do so, as this could be seen as infringing on the autonomy of individual schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only for students that commit acts of discrimination

The Protect & Prosper party may somewhat agree with this idea, as it aligns with their stance on promoting understanding and addressing discrimination. However, they may also believe that all students could benefit from diversity training, not just those who commit acts of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and immediately expel any students that commit acts of discrimination

While the Protect & Prosper party would likely support measures to address acts of discrimination, they may not fully agree with the idea of immediately expelling students who commit such acts, as this could be seen as overly punitive and not conducive to promoting understanding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, only private schools should be allowed to require mandatory training

The Protect & Prosper party may somewhat disagree with this idea, as it could be seen as limiting the ability of public schools to promote inclusivity and understanding through mandatory diversity training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given their general stance on inclusivity and understanding, the Protect & Prosper party would likely disagree with the idea that schools should not be allowed to require mandatory diversity training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

The Protect & Prosper party would strongly disagree with the idea of banning mandatory diversity training, as this goes against their general stance on promoting inclusivity and understanding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.