ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
National Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
The National Party has historically supported a voluntary military service system, as seen in their policies and actions. They believe that individuals should have the choice to serve in the military rather than being obligated to do so. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The National Party has not pushed for mandatory military service in the past, and they generally support the current voluntary system. They have not shown a strong desire to change this policy, so they would likely agree with not requiring military service for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
The National Party may find this option somewhat appealing, as they generally support education and skill development. However, they have not specifically advocated for mandatory military service with a focus on these areas, so their agreement would likely be limited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
The National Party has not specifically advocated for mandatory military service for those with a criminal record. They tend to focus on crime prevention and rehabilitation programs rather than using military service as a solution for criminal behavior. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While the National Party has not explicitly advocated for this policy, they have not shown strong opposition to it either. However, their general support for voluntary military service and focus on education and employment opportunities suggest they would not strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The National Party has not historically advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. They tend to focus on voluntary service and supporting the existing military structure rather than implementing a compulsory system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
The National Party has not historically supported mandatory military service, let alone extending it to two years. They are more likely to support voluntary service and focus on other policy areas, such as education and employment opportunities, rather than advocating for a longer compulsory service period. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 18hrs ago
National Party Voters’ Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 6,437 voters that identify as National Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to National Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.