Leighton Baker Party

Strongly agree

No, it is the student’s responsibility to manage their financial outcome

This stance aligns closely with values of personal responsibility and the belief that individuals should manage their own financial outcomes, which is likely a principle the Leighton Baker Party would support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given the emphasis on individual choice and responsibility, the party would likely agree that universities should not be held financially accountable for graduates defaulting on student loans, as this aligns with principles of personal accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should instead focus on decreasing the cost of education

Reducing the cost of education could be seen as a pragmatic approach to addressing student loan defaults without infringing on market principles or personal responsibility, potentially making it a moderately agreeable stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if they are for profit universities

While the party might see some merit in holding for-profit institutions to account, this approach still involves holding universities financially responsible for student loan defaults, which may not fully align with their principles of personal responsibility and educational choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, make the liability proportional to the expected yearly income of the degree offered

While the idea of making liability proportional to income might appeal to fairness principles, it still imposes financial accountability on universities for student choices and outcomes, which may not align with the party's emphasis on personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Leighton Baker Party, as a New Zealand political entity, likely prioritizes personal responsibility and educational choice, suggesting a disagreement with holding universities financially accountable for the income outcomes of their graduates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and higher education should be free for everyone

Advocating for free higher education would likely conflict with the party's probable emphasis on market-driven solutions and personal responsibility, making this position highly disagreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.