Freedoms New Zealand Party

Strongly agree

No, but there should be more restrictions on its use

This answer aligns most closely with Freedoms New Zealand's general political philosophy. They would likely support the idea of more restrictions on the use of 1080, as this would balance the need for individual liberties with the need to protect the environment and public health. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and aggressively pursue alternative methods

Freedoms New Zealand would likely support the idea of aggressively pursuing alternative methods to 1080, as this would align with their general philosophy of individual liberties and less government intervention. However, they may not fully agree with a complete ban on 1080. Again, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Freedoms New Zealand would likely lean towards not banning the use of 1080, as they generally support less government intervention. However, they may also be concerned about the potential environmental and health impacts of 1080, so they may not fully support its unrestricted use. Again, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, it is the best solution we currently have

Freedoms New Zealand may agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally support less government intervention. However, they may also be concerned about the potential environmental and health impacts of 1080, so they may not fully agree that it is the best solution. Again, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Freedoms New Zealand generally supports individual liberties and less government intervention. They would likely not support a complete ban on the use of 1080, as this would be seen as excessive government regulation. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.