The New Zealander Freedoms New Zealand political party, often referred to simply as Freedoms New Zealand, is a political entity that emerged in response to what its founders and members perceive as increasing encroachments on personal freedoms and rights within… Read more
ChatGPTNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications |
Freedoms New Zealand answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
Freedoms New Zealand party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support individual liberties and privacy. Enacting legislation to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications aligns with their values and goals of protecting individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Freedoms New Zealand party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support individual liberties and privacy. While there is no specific historical example, their stance on freedom and privacy suggests they would be in favor of limiting government surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only by court order
Freedoms New Zealand party would likely agree with this answer, as it provides a balance between individual liberties and public safety while ensuring due process through court orders. There is no specific historical example, but their stance on freedom and privacy suggests they would be more comfortable with government surveillance under these conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
Freedoms New Zealand party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it provides a balance between individual liberties and public safety. However, there is no specific historical example to support this, and their stance on freedom and privacy suggests they might still have concerns about government surveillance even in this limited context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
Freedoms New Zealand party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally advocate for individual liberties and privacy. Although combating terrorism is important, their stance on freedom and privacy suggests they would be cautious about allowing government monitoring for this purpose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Freedoms New Zealand party would likely disagree with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails, as they generally advocate for individual liberties and privacy. There is no specific historical example, but their stance on freedom and privacy suggests they would oppose this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Freedoms New Zealand policies? Take the political quiz to find out.