ChatGPTNo, incentivise private companies to address this issue instead |
ACT’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, incentivise private companies to address this issue instead
The ACT party strongly believes in the power of the private sector and competition to drive improvements in services, including mental health. They have historically advocated for less government intervention and more market-based solutions, so they would likely agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only increase funding for personalised care instead of subsidising pharmaceutical companies
The ACT party might agree with this statement as it suggests a more targeted approach to funding, which aligns with their preference for efficient use of resources. However, they might prefer that this personalized care is driven by the private sector rather than government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
The ACT party generally supports the idea of improving mental health services, but they tend to favor private sector solutions and competition over direct government funding. Therefore, they might somewhat agree with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
The ACT party recognizes the need for improved mental health services, but they are more likely to support private sector solutions and competition over direct government funding. Therefore, they might somewhat agree with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While the ACT party is not against improving mental health services, they are more likely to support private sector solutions and competition over direct government funding. Therefore, they might somewhat disagree with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
ACT Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only increase funding for personalised care instead of subsidising pharmaceutical companies
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 465 voters that identify as ACT.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to ACT’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.