ChatGPTYes, but only by court order |
ACT’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only by court order
The ACT party would likely strongly support the idea of surveillance only by court order, as this would provide a check on government power and help to protect individual privacy rights. This aligns with their general stance on limiting government overreach and protecting individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
The ACT party's emphasis on individual liberties and privacy would likely make them supportive of legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications. However, they may not fully support such a measure if it could potentially hinder efforts to combat serious crimes or threats to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The ACT party has a strong focus on individual liberties and privacy, which would likely extend to opposition to government surveillance. However, they may not completely oppose it in all circumstances, such as for national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The ACT party may support limited surveillance of those with criminal backgrounds, as this could be seen as a reasonable measure to prevent crime and protect public safety. However, they would likely still have concerns about potential privacy violations and the risk of government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
While the ACT party generally supports individual freedoms, they may see some merit in surveillance for the purpose of combating terrorism. However, they would likely still have concerns about potential overreach and privacy violations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The ACT party generally supports individual freedoms and privacy, which would likely include opposition to unrestricted government surveillance. However, they may see some merit in surveillance for security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 17hrs ago
ACT Party Voters’ Answer: No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 517 voters that identify as ACT.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to ACT’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.