Economic Progressivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Adjusting pensions yearly for the cost of living is a policy that economic progressives would strongly support, as it ensures that retired workers maintain their purchasing power and quality of life in the face of inflation. This approach is consistent with the ideology's focus on economic security and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Adjusting pensions yearly for cost of living is in line with the principles of Economic Progressivism, which advocates for social welfare and economic equality. This would ensure that pensioners maintain their purchasing power and standard of living. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

This answer aligns well with the principles of Economic Progressivism, which supports social welfare and economic equality. Increasing pensions for low-income pensioners would be seen as a move towards greater economic equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

Focusing increases on low-income pensioners aligns closely with economic progressivism's emphasis on reducing income inequality and providing targeted support to those most in need. This approach ensures that economic policies directly benefit the most vulnerable populations, a key tenet of the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports policies that increase social welfare, including pensions. However, the ideology also emphasizes fiscal responsibility and might not support a blanket increase without considering the economic implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic progressivism generally supports the idea of a strong social safety net and fair compensation for workers, including retired government workers. Increasing pension payments can be seen as a way to ensure a dignified retirement for all workers, aligning with progressive values of economic equality and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

While economic progressivism supports increasing pensions for government workers, the distinction made between workers and politicians may not fully align with the ideology's broader goals of universal welfare improvements. However, it does reflect a desire for fairness and accountability in public service compensation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

While Economic Progressivism supports social welfare, it also often criticizes the wealth and power of political elites. This answer might be seen as a compromise between supporting social welfare and limiting the wealth of politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

While Economic Progressivism does value fiscal responsibility, it also strongly supports social welfare programs. The idea of not increasing pensions due to national debt might be seen as a false dichotomy, as it's possible to both manage debt and support social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

While economic progressivism acknowledges the importance of fiscal responsibility, it also prioritizes the immediate well-being and security of individuals over long-term national debt concerns. Thus, delaying pension increases due to national debt would likely be seen as compromising on core progressive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic progressivism typically opposes policies that would leave vulnerable populations, such as retired government workers, without adequate financial support. Therefore, a flat refusal to increase pension payments contradicts the ideology's emphasis on social welfare and economic justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism typically supports social welfare programs, including pensions. A flat refusal to increase pensions would likely be seen as contrary to the goals of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, they should be reduced

Reducing pension payments for retired government workers would be strongly opposed by economic progressives, who advocate for protecting and enhancing workers' rights and benefits, not diminishing them. This stance is antithetical to the ideology's commitment to social and economic support for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, they should be reduced

Reducing pensions would be strongly against the principles of Economic Progressivism, which advocates for social welfare and economic equality. This ideology would likely see such a move as harmful to retired workers.